在学习、工作、生活中，大家都不可避免地会接触到作文吧，作文是通过文字来表达一个主题意义的记叙方法。相信许多人会觉得作文很难写吧，以下是小编整理的英语作文4篇，欢迎大家分享。
英语作文 篇1
【写作题目】
Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a composition on the topic Work with a Person or Work with a Machine? You should write at least 150 words and base your composition on the outline given below:
1)一些人喜欢和人打交道多的工作
2)然而也有一些人更愿意和机器打交道
3)你更喜欢哪种工作?为什么?
【思路点拨】
本题属于提纲式文字命题。提纲第1点要求指出人们的`一种喜好，提纲第2点要求指出人们的另外一种喜好，提纲第3点要求“我”从中做出选择，由此可判断本文应为对比选择型作文。
根据所给提纲，本文应包含以下内容：指出人们对于工作的两种喜好：喜欢和人打交道多的工作，喜欢和机器打交道多的工作;对比阐述两种工作各自的特点;表明“我”更喜欢哪种工作，并说明理由。
【参考范文】
Work with a Person or Work with a Machine?
When asked about work preference, different people will give different answers. Some people like working with people. However, others prefer jobs which mainly involve objects or machines.
Those people who have the first preference believe working with people usually makes one feel interesting and efficient. In addition, they maintain people can be inspired to bring forward new ideas by communicating or consulting with those around them. However, still others have different preferences. In their opinions, working with objects or machines can make one enjoy more peace and quiet. Besides, they argue, under such peaceful conditions, one can do more practical work, improve his skill and make technical renovations.
Weighing up these two kinds of work, I prefer working with people. For one thing, I like to cooperate with others and work in a team. For another, although there are competition and rivalry, we can learn something from other people. Considering these, I think, working with people is beneficial to our career development.
英语作文 篇2
In ten years., people will have robots in their homes. And people won’t use money, everything will be free. Books will only be on computers, not on paper. Kids won’t go to school. They will studying at home on computers. I think there will only be one country. People will live to be 200 years old There will be more people. There will be more free time. And there will be more tress. And there will be more cars. There will be less pollution There will be more tress. And cities will be very big and clean
英语作文 篇3
here is a picture of a tall cylinder with three holes under thefaucet. the water keeps running from the faucet through the water tap into the cylinder. as there are three holes in it, the cylinder can never be filled and keeps leaking water.
from the way water is corning out of the holes we can see pressure increases with depth.let us look at the first hole on the top. as the hole is very near to the surface of water, the pressure at the top is not as high as that in the middle and at the bottom. the water is coming out of the hole at an angle of 30 degrees. it fails to the ground at a distance not far from the cylinder.
now please have a look at the hole in the middle. the hole is farther away from the surface of the water. here the water is deeper and so is the pressure. as a result the falling water comes down with more force at an angle of 45 degrees.last and not least, i would like to call your attention to the hole at the bottom. as it is deep at the bottom, the water receives the moist pressure. the force of water coming out of the hole is strongest and it springs out at an angle of nearly 170 degrees falling down far away from the cylinder.
now it is clear to me why man achieves success under great pressure, my dear friends, do not bo afraid of pressuro. the more pressute, the more chance of success.
英语作文 篇4
Staggering
Things are slow to change in America's boardrooms
THE annual review of American company board practices by Korn/Ferry, a firm of headhunters, is a useful indicator of the health of corporate governance. This year's review, published on November 12th, shows that the Sarbanes-Oxley act, passed in 20xx to try to prevent a repeat of corporate collapses such as Enron's and WorldCom's, has had an impact on the boardroom--albeit at an average implementation cost that Korn/Ferry estimates at $5.1m per firm.
Two years ago, only 41% of American firms said they regularly held meetings of directors without their chief executive present; this year the figure was 93%. But some things have been surprisingly unaffected by the backlash against corporate scandals. For example, despite a growing feeling that former chief executives should not sit on their company's board, the percentage of American firms where they do has actually edged up, from 23% in 20xx to 25% in 20xx.
Also, disappointingly few firms have split the jobs of chairman and chief executive. Another survey of American boards published this week, by A.T. Kearney, a firm of consultants, found that in 20xx 14% of the boards of S&P 500 firms had separated the roles, and a further 16% said they planned to do so. But by 20xx only 23% overall had taken the plunge. A survey earlier in the year by consultants at McKinsey found that 70% of American directors and investors supported the idea of splitting the jobs, which is standard practice in Europe.
Another disappointment is the slow progress in abolishing "staggered" boards--ones where only one-third of the directors are up for re-election each year, to three-year terms. Invented as a defence against takeover, such boards, according to a new Harvard Law School study by Lucian Bebchuk and Alma Cohen, are unambiguously "associated with an economically significant reduction in
【【热门】英语作文四篇】相关文章：